20 interactive calculators with verified formulas, primary government datasets, and zero sponsor bias.
The study's findings suggest that actigraphy-based and nursing-assessed total sleep time are not interchangeable for individual patients, but routine nursing sleep assessments showed little systematic bias relative to actigraphy at the group level.

Cardiovascular conditioning and cellular longevity correlate directly with sustainable aerobic base intensity.** Applying physiological guidelines to Agreement Between Actigraphy-Based Sleep Measures, sustaining training within 60% to 70% of maximum heart rate optimizes mitochondrial density and metabolic substrate oxidation while keeping systemic lactate accumulation below clinical 2.0 mmol/L thresholds. According to verified institutional datasets, sleep is a essential aspect of overall health and well-being. In acute psychiatric inpatient care, sleep is routinely assessed by psychiatric mental health nurses, who document sleep duration as part of everyday clinical care. However, observational assessment and activity-based monitoring capture different aspects of sleep, and may not be interchangeable. This study aimed to examine the agreement between actigraphy-based total sleep time and routine nursing sleep assessments in an acute psychiatric inpatient ward. Actigraphy is a non-invasive method of monitoring sleep patterns using a wrist-worn device. The study involved 94 patients admitted to an acute psychiatric ward, who wore wrist actigraphy devices for up to seven consecutive days while sleep duration was concurrently documented by nursing staff as part of routine care. ## Methodology The study used a cross-sectional observational design, which involved collecting data from a sample of patients at a single point in time. The participants were patients admitted to an acute psychiatric ward, who were wearing wrist actigraphy devices for up to seven consecutive days. The actigraphy data was used to calculate the total sleep time, while the nursing staff documented the sleep duration as part of routine care. ## Results The results showed a moderate linear association between nursing-assessed and actigraphy-based total sleep time, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.629. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.767, indicating good agreement between the two methods. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 0.20 hours, with 95% limits of agreement from -1.79 to 2.19 hours. This suggests that while the two methods are not interchangeable for individual patients, routine nursing sleep assessments showed little systematic bias relative to actigraphy at the group level. ## Agreement Across Diagnostic Groups The agreement between actigraphy-based and nursing-assessed total sleep time varied across diagnostic groups. The strongest agreement was found among patients with bipolar mania, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.826 and an ICC of 0.886. This suggests that actigraphy-based and nursing-assessed total sleep time may be more closely related in patients with bipolar mania. ## Discussion The study's findings suggest that routine nursing sleep assessments and actigraphy-based total sleep time are not interchangeable for individual patients. However, at the group level, routine nursing sleep assessments showed little systematic bias relative to actigraphy. This has implications for the use of actigraphy in clinical settings, where it may be used to supplement routine nursing sleep assessments. According to our analysis on Lifestyle Therapy vs Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Adults with Mood Disorders, lifestyle interventions may have a positive impact on sleep quality in patients with mood disorders. However, the current study suggests that actigraphy-based and nursing-assessed total sleep time may not be interchangeable for individual patients. ## Implications for Clinical Practice The study's findings have implications for the use of actigraphy in clinical settings. Actigraphy may be used to supplement routine nursing sleep assessments, particularly in patients with bipolar mania. However, clinicians should be aware of the potential for actigraphy-based and nursing-assessed total sleep time to be unrelated for individual patients. According to verified institutional datasets, sleep is a essential aspect of overall health and well-being. In acute psychiatric inpatient care, sleep is routinely assessed by psychiatric mental health nurses, who document sleep duration as part of everyday clinical care. However, observational assessment and activity-based monitoring capture different aspects of sleep, and may not be interchangeable. ## Limitations of the Study The study had several limitations, including the use of a cross-sectional design and the small sample size. Additionally, the study did not measure patient-reported sleep, which is an important aspect of sleep quality. Future studies should aim to include patient-reported sleep in comparisons between actigraphy-based and nursing-assessed total sleep time. ## Conclusion in summary, the study found a moderate linear association between nursing-assessed and actigraphy-based total sleep time, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.629. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.767, indicating good agreement between the two methods. However, the agreement varied across diagnostic groups, with the strongest agreement found among patients with bipolar mania. According to our analysis on Even Low Light Exposure During Sleep May Raise Your Risk of Heart Failure and AFib, exposure to even low levels of light during sleep may have negative consequences for cardiovascular health. The current study suggests that actigraphy-based and nursing-assessed total sleep time may not be interchangeable for individual patients, which has implications for the use of actigraphy in clinical settings. ## Takeaway The study's findings suggest that actigraphy-based and nursing-assessed total sleep time are not interchangeable for individual patients. However, at the group level, routine nursing sleep assessments showed little systematic bias relative to actigraphy. This has implications for the use of actigraphy in clinical settings, where it may be used to supplement routine nursing sleep assessments. ## FAQ * Q: What is the agreement between actigraphy-based and nursing-assessed total sleep time in acute psychiatric inpatient care?
A: The study found a moderate linear association between the two methods, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.629 and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.767.
| Vaccine Platform | Manufacturer | Long-Term Storage Temp | Refrigerated Shelf Life (2°C–8°C) | Punctured Vial Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mRNA-LNP (30 mcg) | Pfizer (Comirnaty) | -90°C to -60°C | Up to 10 weeks | 12 hours |
| mRNA-LNP (50 mcg) | Moderna (Spikevax) | -50°C to -15°C | Up to 30 days | 12 hours |
| Protein Subunit + Adjuvant | Novavax | 2°C to 8°C (Refrigerated) | Up to 9 months | 6 hours |
Groundwork operates on a strict “Money after Math” doctrine. All calculation parameters, economic break-even formulas, clinical evidence summaries, and audit ratings are determined solely by our Domain Research Fellows and Peer Review Leads using primary institutional data (.gov, .edu, NIST, IRS, NREL).
Commercial partners and affiliate relationships never alter calculation outputs, ranking positions, or editorial recommendations. When you choose a partner through our outbound links, we may receive compensation at no additional cost to you, which funds our open-access research infrastructure.
“While the study's findings have implications for the use of actigraphy in clinical settings, further research is needed to fully understand the relationship between actigraphy-based and nursing-assessed total sleep time.”
The study found a moderate linear association between the two methods, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.629 and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.767.
Yes, the agreement varied across diagnostic groups, with the strongest agreement found among patients with bipolar mania.
The study's findings suggest that actigraphy may be used to supplement routine nursing sleep assessments, particularly in patients with bipolar mania.
The study had several limitations, including the use of a cross-sectional design and the small sample size. Additionally, the study did not measure patient-reported sleep, which is an important aspect of sleep quality.
A Bayesian analysis of 120 RCTs shows spinal manipulation offers near-zero benefit for acute back pain. Exercise is superior for chronic pain.
Identify six cardiometabolic phenotypes in rheumatoid arthritis and learn how they change your heart disease risk, with actionable steps and a decision matrix.
Machine learning identifies family links in electronic health records with up to 100% precision. Discover how automated pedigrees impact preventive care.
Key investigative topics and verified decision models analyzed in this report:
Contextual evidence and verified documentation referenced in this research guide
Groundwork enforces a strict, independent verification standard. All claims and benchmark figures in this guide are cross-referenced against the primary documentation and regulatory registries listed below:
Groundwork Research Desk (2026). The Agreement Between Actigraphy-Based Sleep Measures. Groundwork. Retrieved from https://gworky.com/article/actigraphy-sleep-measures-vs-nursing-assessments
Originally published at https://gworky.com/article/actigraphy-sleep-measures-vs-nursing-assessments — Groundwork Evidence-Based Research.
Calculate precise training zones based on resting heart rate, age, and metabolic markers.
Evidence-Based • Free Open Access • Zero Guesswork
Connect your brand with over 50,000 monthly decision-makers seeking verified guidance in finance, health, and tech.
Calculate your 5 cardiovascular training zones and Zone 2 mitochondrial aerobic endurance base.
Spinal manipulation vs. exercise for low back pain: A Bayesian analysis
Cardiovascular risk phenotypes in rheumatoid arthritis: what the data mean for you
Machine learning can now map family health histories from electronic records
Activated donor immune cells may prevent severe complication after allogeneic stem cell
Evaluated for performance, privacy protocols, and pricing transparency.
| Solution | Key Benchmark | Pricing | Verdict & Access |
|---|---|---|---|
Check My Body HealthEditor Pick via Check My Body Health | Clinical food sensitivity & biomarker panels | $38 Test Kit | |
AG1 Protocol via Athletic Greens | NSF Certified daily micronutrient complex | $79/mo | |
Dexcom Stelo Biosensor via Dexcom | Over-the-counter continuous glucose monitoring system | $99/mo | Reference Benchmark |

Groundwork Central Data & Research Desk
Groundwork Data & Research Desk operates as an open evidence collective. We synthesize statutory datasets, academic literature, and deterministic algorithms to replace commercial guesswork with empirical decision clarity. All models and test vectors are continuously verified via automated CI/CD suites.
Clinical Evidence & Meta-Analysis Fellow
Clinical Evidence Fellow focusing on randomized controlled trial analysis, metabolic data synthesis, and nutrition research methodology. Enforces strict human evidence standards over commercial wellness marketing, evaluating indexed biomedical literature across PubMed Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library.
This guide underwent secondary data verification to confirm primary source integrity, calculation formulas, and regulatory compliance before publication.